Free from Harm promotes farmed animal rescue, education and advocacy… and the power of our forks!

In The News Header

Breaking the Food Chain Myth

Claiming to be at the top of the food chain is a popular justification for eating animal products and an affirmation of our ability to violently dominate everyone. Yet justifications for violence that draw on notions of power and supremacy are based on the philosophy that “Might makes right” — the principle behind the worst atrocities and crimes of human history. Continue reading

Milk of the Poisonous Tree: Reconnecting with Our Food Choices

There are many familiar claims through which we seek to deny personal responsibility for our food choices despite the fact that eating animal products means we pay someone else to dominate, exploit and violently kill healthy, infant or adolescent animals who want to live. Following are a few common examples: “You can still eat animals and love them;” Continue reading

One Survivor’s Story of Whole Foods Humane Hoax

They named her Mei Hua (Beautiful Flower), the sweet little hen DxE rescued from near death inside of a living hell, a Whole Foods egg supplier. Check out this moving video about the investigation and rescue of Mei Hua and the photos we obtained showing her transformation and rehabilitation. She is now living peacefully on a sanctuary in California. Continue reading

Hunting for Wildlife Population Control and Ethical Eating?

Hunters sometimes argue that if they were to stop hunting, the deer population would explode. This is a false argument, because if hunting were to stop, we would also stop the practices that increase the deer population. State wildlife management agencies artificially boost the deer population in order to increase recreational hunting opportunities for hunters. Continue reading

Animals Can’t Reason, Don’t Deserve Same Consideration

Regarding the question of how we ought to treat nonhuman animals, philosopher Jeremy Bentham famously wrote, The question is not, “Can they reason?” nor “Can they talk?” but, “Can they suffer?” Indeed, the capacity for a being to experience pain and suffering is the only morally relevant criterion needed to determine that we should refrain from inflicting pain and suffering. Continue reading

Animals Eat Other Animals, So Why Shouldn’t We?

Many people insist that eating animals is “natural” — and therefore morally neutral — because other animals eat animals. But it’s important to realize that, with a few exceptions, when humans kill other animals for food, we’re not doing what animals do in nature. Humans have no biological need to consume meat or any animal products. Continue reading